Responsible Officer: Deputy Vice-Chancellor

Designated Officer: Director, Office of Learning, Teaching and Research

Council Approval: Council C03/47, 12 August 2003

Last Amended: -

Related Policies: -

Attachment: Program and Course Accreditation Flowcharts (PDF 74KB)

Overview

As a self-accrediting institution, the University accredits its award programs and courses through the University Council. Accreditation of programs and courses is a form of peer review that plays a major role in assuring the quality of learning and teaching in the University.

Policy

1. International Standards

1.1 The University of the Sunshine Coast pursues international standards of excellence in learning and teaching. In conformity with the University Act and to help achieve these standards, the Council and the Academic Board accredit the University's award programs and courses.

2. Accreditation Criteria

2.1 Accreditation of programs and courses requires effective curriculum design, such as appropriate breadth, depth, coherence, relevance and currency of content and methods.

2.2 Accreditation also requires evidence of sufficient demand to warrant proposed programs and courses, evidence that the University has the necessary resources to sustain provision of proposed programs and courses, and evidence that they contribute to the University's strategic aims in learning and teaching.

3. Reaccreditation and Discontinuation

3.1 Programs are accredited for five years. After five years, programs may be reaccredited on a five-yearly basis, or discontinued. In exceptional circumstances, programs may be subject to a reaccreditation process in less than five years.

3.2 Courses are accredited indefinitely and may be discontinued at the request of a Dean.

4. Program and Course Changes

4.1 Programs and courses can be changed during their period of accreditation.

4.2 The Deputy Vice-Chancellor determines whether proposed changes are substantial or administrative.

4.3 The outcome of proposals for substantial changes to programs or course that are likely to affect students' experience of programs or courses are determined by the Academic Board.

4.4 The outcome of proposals for administrative changes to programs or course that are unlikely to have a significant affect on students' experience of programs or courses are determined by Deans.

5. Roles and Responsibilities

5.1 The University Council

5.1.1 The University Council determines the outcome of proposals to accredit programs that involve the entry of the University into a discipline not currently taught in the University and proposals for new programs in existing disciplines but at a higher academic level.

5.1.2 The University Council also determines the outcomes of proposals to discontinue programs.

5.2 The Academic Board

5.2.1 The Academic Board makes recommendations to the University Council on proposals to accredit programs that involve the entry of the University into a discipline not currently taught in the University and proposals for new programs in existing disciplines but at a higher academic level.

5.2.2 The Academic Board, under delegation from the University Council, determines the outcomes of proposals for the accreditation and reaccreditation of programs, and the accreditation of courses, that do not take the University into new disciplines or higher academic levels of existing disciplines.

5.2.3 The Academic Board determines the outcomes of proposals to make substantial changes to programs and courses.

5.2.4 The Academic Board makes recommendations to the University Council on proposals to discontinue programs.

5.3 The Learning and Teaching Management Committee

5.3.1 The Learning and Teaching Management Committee makes recommendations to the Academic Board on proposals for the accreditation and reaccreditation of all programs, the accreditation of all courses, substantial changes to programs and courses, and discontinuation of programs and courses.

5.4 Faculty Program Advisory Committees

5.4.1 Faculty Program Advisory Committees provide advice to the Academic Board on proposals for the accreditation, reaccreditation and discontinuation of programs and courses.

5.5 Faculty Learning and Teaching Committees

5.5.1 On behalf of Deans, faculty learning and teaching committees develop accreditation and reaccreditation proposals for programs, accreditation proposals for courses, proposals for changes to programs and courses, and proposals for discontinuation of programs and courses.

5.5.2 Joint meetings of relevant faculty learning and teaching committees develop proposals for accreditation, reaccreditation and changes to combined degree programs.

5.6 Deputy Vice-Chancellor

5.6.1 The Deputy Vice-Chancellor is responsible for the implementation of program and course accreditation on behalf of the University. This includes making and communicating judgements about the extent to which proposals meet accreditation criteria.

5.7 Deans

5.7.1 Deans are responsible for the implementation of program and course accreditation at faculty level and for assisting the Deputy Vice-Chancellor in this at University level. This includes making and communicating judgements about the extent to which proposals meet accreditation criteria.

Program and Course Accreditation Policy Flowcharts (PDF 74KB)

To view PDF documents you must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader, which can be downloaded from the Adobe Download page.