Student Handbook, Semester 1, 2008: Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedures | UniSC | University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Accessibility links

Non-production environment - wwwtest.usc.edu.au
This page was archived on 29 February 2008 and is no longer updated.

Student Handbook, Semester 1, 2008: Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedures

Responsible officer:

Vice-Chancellor

Designated officer:

Director, Human Resources and Director, Student Services

Date of approval:

31 October 2007

Date last amended: 31 October 2007

Effective starting date:

26 November 2002

Any procedures replaced by these procedures:

Discrimination and Harassment Procedures

Related policies:

  • Code of Conduct
  • Certified Agreement (2004-2008)
  • Equity - Governing Policy
  • Recruitment, Selection and Appointment Policy
  • University Health and Safety Policy

1. Definitions

‘Conciliation’ is the process through which the parties involved in any allegation, with assistance from a neutral person (a conciliator), discuss the issues in order to develop options and consider alternatives with the goal of reaching a consensual agreement or outcome.

‘Conciliator’ is a trained person appointed by the Director, Human Resources to conciliate between the parties in a non-judgemental and independent manner. In some circumstances, an external person may be appointed as a conciliator.

‘Grievance’ is a concern or complaint about an act, behaviour, omission, situation or decision, which an individual believes is unfair or unjustified.

‘Investigator’ is a person appointed by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor to investigate a formal complaint. In some circumstances, an external person may be appointed as an investigator.

‘Natural justice’ provides that all parties must be given the opportunity to present their case, be fully informed about allegations and decisions made and have the right of representation by another person. A decision-maker in relation to the grievance should have no personal interest in the matter and should be unbiased in their decisions.

‘Respondent’ is the person(s) against whom a complaint is made.

‘Support officers’ are identified members of the University community, trained as required to provide support and advice on options for resolving harassment and discrimination complaints. They will not investigate or conciliate a complaint.

2. Procedures

These procedures apply to staff engaged in all activities central to, or reasonably connected with, their role at the University. This includes field trips, fieldwork and social functions directly related to the activities of the University. These procedures are designed to ensure that all complaints are effectively dealt with in a sensitive, timely and confidential manner, and in accordance with the principles of natural justice.

There are several options for dealing with complaints of discrimination and harassment. Multiple options may be appropriate in some circumstances, and procedures may commence in any order or at any stage. Individuals should choose the option with which they feel most comfortable. At any time, an individual may contact their supervisor or Human Resource staff for assistance. Below is a summary of procedural options for complaints.

3. Informal procedures

3.1 Option 1: Deal with the matter individually: An individual may attempt to resolve the matter personally. In this option, an individual will complain or object to the behaviour or action directly with the respondent(s) involved, making it clear that the behaviour or action is offensive and unacceptable. This may be done in writing, eg by email, or directly in person, in which case it is recommended that the complainant keep a record of the discussion.

3.2 Option 2: Deal with the matter individually with advice from a support officer and/or supervisor: Contact a support officer or supervisor, who can provide information about the complainant’s rights and responsibilities and suggest options on how best to deal with the situation.

3.3 Option 3: Conciliation: Contact the Director, Human Resources directly. The Director, Human Resources may assign a conciliator. The Director, Human Resources or the conciliator will approach the respondent and detail the complaint. All parties will be given the opportunity to state their case and how they would see the situation being resolved. The conciliator will assist the parties to attempt to reach a mutually acceptable solution. Depending on the circumstances, the identity of the complainant(s) will not be disclosed to the respondent unless agreed by the complainant(s).

Back to top

4. Formal procedures

4.1 Option 4: Formal complaint: A formal complaint may be made in writing, by the complainant, to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor.

a) The complaint must contain sufficient details for consideration of any allegations by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor. In cases where the complaint is considered lacking in sufficient detail, the complainant may be advised to contact a support officer or interpreter for further assistance.

b) A formal complaint would normally be made within 12 months of the last occurrence of the alleged discrimination or harassment.

c) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor will acknowledge receipt of the written complaint within 5 working days. A copy of the written complaint will be given to the respondent.

d) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor may establish an investigation to be conducted by a suitable person (the Investigator) unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the complaint is ill founded. The Investigator will have had no former involvement in the complaint and they will have access to all persons and information they consider relevant, including the respondent(s) to the complaint.

e) If the Deputy Vice-Chancellor decides that the complaint does not constitute a breach of the University’s Discrimination and Harassment - Governing Policy, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor will inform the complainant in writing that no further action will be taken and the reason(s) for the decision.

f) If the Deputy Vice-Chancellor decides that the complaint does constitute a breach of the University’s Discrimination and Harassment Policy, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor may commence misconduct or serious misconduct proceedings as provided for under the University’s Certified Agreement.

g) Should a formal complaint be made before the informal procedures are followed, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor may refer the complaint to the Director, Human Resources to try to resolve the matter informally.

4.2 Option 5: Complaint to an external agency: The University recognises an individual’s right to refer a complaint to a relevant external agency at any time. External agencies may include the Police, Australian Industrial Relations Commission, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Queensland Anti-Discrimination Commission, or union. These actions are outside the scope of the University Complaint Procedures.

Back to top

Summary of procedural options for complaints

Informal options What to do Expected outcomes
1. Deal with the matter personally Complain directly to the individual(s) about their actions and/or behaviour A record should be kept
2. Contact a support officer Support officer/supervisor will advise on available options Select your preferred option
3. Conciliation Contact a support officer, or the Director, Human Resources An appropriate outcome will be sought


Formal options What to do Expected outcomes
4. Make a formal complaint A written complaint is made to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Appropriate action is taken. An investigator may be appointed.
5. Complain to an external agency Complain directly to the Police, AIRC, HREOC, QADC or the union. Appropriate action is taken.

5. Respondent support

The respondent to a formal or informal complaint of discrimination or harassment can seek assistance from the Director, Human Resources.

6. Record keeping

For options 2 and 3, a confidential ‘Incident Report’ must be completed by Support Officers, The Director, Human Resources or Conciliators for all complaints. An Incident Report will not include any identifying material, but will include the status, broad area of employment or study, as appropriate, of the complainant and respondent, as well as the nature of the complaint and the action taken.

In the case of Option 4, a formal complaint, the finding, the action taken and all other documentation (including any tape recordings) relating to the complaint will be kept in a confidential file with access restricted to persons specified by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and the Director, Human Resources. All documents will be held in accordance with the University’s records policies. If a complaint is subsequently lodged with an external body, records may need to be accessed in order to demonstrate that reasonable steps were taken to deal with matter.

7. Confidentiality

It is essential to keep confidential all information about alleged harassment and discrimination before, during and after the complaint resolution process. This is to ensure fair treatment and process, to protect the complainant(s) and respondent(s), to minimise the risk of victimisation and to avoid defamation proceedings. For these reasons, only those directly and legitimately involved in the resolution process should be informed about the details of a complaint and only then with the complainant’s consent. In the event of a breach of confidentiality, the matter will be investigated by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and action taken as appropriate.

Back to top

8. Defamation

Defamation is the publication of a statement about a person, which causes that person’s reputation with other people to be lowered, or causes them to be shunned, avoided or brought into ridicule. An accusation of harassment or discrimination can be potentially defamatory if confidentiality is not observed and an individual’s reputation is damaged.

It is not defamatory for an individual to confront an alleged harasser directly (either in person or by mail) to alert them that their behaviour is unwelcome, nor is it defamatory to make a complaint to a person who has a legitimate interest in knowing about an incident in order to seek redress under these procedures. Information provided in a complaint may be subject to disclosure resulting from an application made under the Freedom of Information Act (Qld) 1992. University complaint procedures may protect against defamation under the laws relating to defamation. The risk of defamation can be minimised if a complaint is handled by as few people as possible and confidentiality is strictly observed. Protection from a defamation action may be lost if the complaint is false, or is made in bad faith and is motivated by malice, ie made solely or largely with the intention of causing harm to the respondent.

9. Victimisation

Victimisation is the imposition of unjust penalties or taking unjust detrimental action against a person who reasonably asserts their own or another person’s rights under these procedures, has made or proposes to make a complaint, and/or appears or proposes to appear as a witness for a formal investigation. Victimisation of any person involved in a complaint is unacceptable and may constitute an infringement of the Code of Conduct.

10. Vexatious complaints

Vexatious complaints are those that are false or are made in bad faith and are motivated by malice, for example made solely or largely with the intention of causing harm to the respondent. Protection for a complainant from a defamation action may be lost where a complaint is found to be vexatious. Further it may constitute an infringement of the Code of Conduct and the University may commence misconduct or serious misconduct proceedings as provided for under the University's Certified Agreement.

Back to top

11. Education and monitoring

The Director, Human Resources will perform an educative role in the elimination of discrimination and harassment and take action to implement these procedures. This includes the selection and training of support officers and conciliators as required, the development and distribution of publicity material to the University community, the arrangement of awareness raising programs and the provision of training for University staff. Names, locations and contact details for support officers will be provided via the portal and University website.

A confidential ‘Incident Report’ must be completed by support officers for all complaints. An Incident Report (refer Appendix 1) will not include any identifying material, but will include the status and broad area of employment as appropriate of the complainant and respondent, as well as the nature of the complaint and the action taken. Incident Reports will be monitored by the Director, Human.

Back to top

Appendix1

Strictly Confidential

Staff Incident Report (to be completed by a Support Officer)
of Harassment, Bullying and Discrimination

Statistical Data Collection Sheet
Staff Incident Report (to be completed by a Support Officer) of Harassment, Bullying and Discrimination

Statistical Data Collection Sheet

Note: no identifying information is to be recorded.

Date of initial incident/complaint: ………/………/………

Cost Centre/Faculty …………………………………………………

Nature of complaint:

  • Physical
  • Verbal
  • Non-Verbal
  • Other ……………………

Person raising the complaint (complainant):

  • Male
  • Female
  • Status:
    • Full time
    • Part time
    • Casual
    • Other

Person alleged to have caused the complaint or incident (respondent):

  • Male
  • Female
  • Status:
    • Full time
    • Part time
    • Casual
    • Other

Brief description of incident:

Action taken/resolution:

Other comments:

Forward to the Director, Human Resources.

Back to top